Sentiment Tagging: Some Guidelines
By: Amber Naslund
Sentiment is a tricky beast.
We all crave the technology that can automatically tell us whether a post we read and track is positive/negative/neutral (and the holy grail would be something that could make next step recommendations). Truth is, we’re not there yet. Technology isn’t perfectly up to the challenge so far, and the complexities and subtleties of human use of language will always render this a difficult task.
For now, and until/unless automated sentiment reaches unquestionable accuracy (not likely anytime soon), the human factor in analysis for sentiment is absolutely critical, and irreplaceable. So, I’m offering a few guidelines here about how *I* judge sentiment on the posts I track. I’ll say that on average, about half the posts I encounter get marked as neutral, so don’t be afraid of that.
A couple of things to note here: this is subjective. Period. And it should make sense in the context of YOUR business. Consistency in application is really the key; once you determine that a certain type of post is classified a certain way, stick with it to ensure that your analysis down the road is sound, and helps provide guidelines for others.
I’d love to hear your additions, questions, and suggestions in the comments.
What I mark as positive:
- Blatant and direct compliments or recommendations, without competitors mentioned. Can include product compliments or positive statements about service and support.
- Posts that contain superlatives in direct reference to our company or product (good, great, awesome)
- Reviews that are clearly complimentary, even if they contain a few improvements we could make
- If the post is a Digg, Stumble, or Delicious (someone found it valuable enough to vote on or bookmark)
- Retweets or links to any of the above posts
Somewhat positive:
- Retweets of our events or publicity (implied endorsement)
- Posts that announce/feature our inclusion in a list, ranking, or otherwise, including along with competitors
- Posts that recommend us alongside competitors
- Inquiries about getting a demo and/or trialing the product (implies good enough impression to ask to see more)
- Retweets or links to any of the above types of posts
Neutral
- Any tweets that are company outreach (from our employees). This helps to not sway the snapshot of what our community is saying, for better or worse
- Links to our website with no commentary at all
- Passing mentions of us in conversation unless they meet pos/neg criteria
- Statements like “checking out Radian6″ without other commentary
- Factual information about our product/brand without reaction or comment (including retweets)
- Links or retweets to our blog, events, etc. that don’t include commentary.
- Troubleshooting inquiries that are simply technical in nature
Somewhat Negative:
- Retweets or links from the community to third-party posts that contain criticism (passive endorsement of the negative content)
- Posts that contain criticisms of our product or service coupled with compliments or positive statements, if the negative seems to outweigh the positive
- Sarcastic comments that allude to a negative experience but without a blatant callout
- Troubleshooting inquiries that include statements of frustration
Negative:
- Clear criticisms or complaints about our product or service. These are usually pretty obvious.
So is this helpful? What would you add, and what else can I help answer? There are no perfect answers, but it sure helps if everyone shares some of their input. What do you think?

If you missed yesterday’s Twebinar with Brad Dancer from the
Stacy DeBroff is the founder of 


