<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sentiment Tagging: Some Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/</link>
	<description>Social media monitoring tools, social media engagement software and social CRM and marketing from the industry leader in social analytics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 手動によるセンチメント測定　ガイドライン &#8211; Radian6 &#171; The Digital Influence Is &#124; ソーシャルメディアリスニング、モニタリング、デジタルマーケティングにフォーカスしたブログ</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6213</link>
		<dc:creator>手動によるセンチメント測定　ガイドライン &#8211; Radian6 &#171; The Digital Influence Is &#124; ソーシャルメディアリスニング、モニタリング、デジタルマーケティングにフォーカスしたブログ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 06:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6213</guid>
		<description>[...] Radian6の過去の記事に手動でセンチメントを測定する際に、判定する人が持つべきカイドラインが記載されていたので妙訳しておく。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Radian6の過去の記事に手動でセンチメントを測定する際に、判定する人が持つべきカイドラインが記載されていたので妙訳しておく。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Gu&#233;ri</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Gu&#233;ri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>Great post. I completely agree.  
  
But what are the &quot;Mixed&quot; sentiment? I have few in my dashboards but don&#039;t get what they are reffering to.  
  
Thank you, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I completely agree.  </p>
<p>But what are the &quot;Mixed&quot; sentiment? I have few in my dashboards but don&#039;t get what they are reffering to.  </p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Gu&#233;ri</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6212</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Gu&#233;ri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6212</guid>
		<description>Great post. I completely agree. 
 
But what are the &quot;Mixed&quot; sentiment? I have few in my dashboards but don&#039;t get what they are reffering to. 
 
Thank you, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I completely agree. </p>
<p>But what are the &quot;Mixed&quot; sentiment? I have few in my dashboards but don&#039;t get what they are reffering to. </p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Private Parties</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-1018</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Parties</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-1018</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;...&lt;/strong&gt;

LGL Funny, I used to be discussing this thing with my older sister the other day, now I&#039;ll have 1 more argument in my hand when it’ll arrive to confrontation when yet again. -YN....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>LGL Funny, I used to be discussing this thing with my older sister the other day, now I&#8217;ll have 1 more argument in my hand when it’ll arrive to confrontation when yet again. -YN&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Hello,
great conversation about transparency.
But due to the fact that I am looking for a tool to monitor the &quot;social-media-voice&quot; I have some questions:

E.g. I am interested in how the people like my new Company --&gt; &quot;XY Pizza Delivery Service &quot;

Assumed I use the radian6 tools, than I could type in my company name (XY Pizza Delivery Service).

How do you deliver the result (and sentiment results), especialy in terms of positive/negative/neutral?

Probably I get the name of the forums (or other source) and the number of accuarate threads with my keyword within a nice design, isn´t?

But how do I get the information if the thread is positive/negative or neutral. Do I get it directly, like in real time?
Due to the fact that you have written that sentiment results are impossible do deliver automaticaly there has to be the described manual work. Would explain it to us,  how does that work to deliver the results in real time?

Thanks for your information and thanks for the transparency of this conversation.

Regards
Felix</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
great conversation about transparency.<br />
But due to the fact that I am looking for a tool to monitor the &#8220;social-media-voice&#8221; I have some questions:</p>
<p>E.g. I am interested in how the people like my new Company &#8211;&gt; &#8220;XY Pizza Delivery Service &#8221;</p>
<p>Assumed I use the radian6 tools, than I could type in my company name (XY Pizza Delivery Service).</p>
<p>How do you deliver the result (and sentiment results), especialy in terms of positive/negative/neutral?</p>
<p>Probably I get the name of the forums (or other source) and the number of accuarate threads with my keyword within a nice design, isn´t?</p>
<p>But how do I get the information if the thread is positive/negative or neutral. Do I get it directly, like in real time?<br />
Due to the fact that you have written that sentiment results are impossible do deliver automaticaly there has to be the described manual work. Would explain it to us,  how does that work to deliver the results in real time?</p>
<p>Thanks for your information and thanks for the transparency of this conversation.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Felix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6182</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6182</guid>
		<description>Hello,  
great conversation about transparency.  
But due to the fact that I am looking for a tool to monitor the &quot;social-media-voice&quot; I have some questions:  
  
E.g. I am interested in how the people like my new Company --&gt; &quot;XY Pizza Delivery Service &quot;  
  
Assumed I use the radian6 tools, than I could type in my company name (XY Pizza Delivery Service).  
  
How do you deliver the result (and sentiment results), especialy in terms of positive/negative/neutral?  
  
Probably I get the name of the forums (or other source) and the number of accuarate threads with my keyword within a nice design, isn&#180;t?  
  
But how do I get the information if the thread is positive/negative or neutral. Do I get it directly, like in real time?  
Due to the fact that you have written that sentiment results are impossible do deliver automaticaly there has to be the described manual work. Would explain it to us,  how does that work to deliver the results in real time?  
  
Thanks for your information and thanks for the transparency of this conversation.  
  
Regards  
Felix </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
great conversation about transparency.<br />
But due to the fact that I am looking for a tool to monitor the &quot;social-media-voice&quot; I have some questions:  </p>
<p>E.g. I am interested in how the people like my new Company &#8211;&gt; &quot;XY Pizza Delivery Service &quot;  </p>
<p>Assumed I use the radian6 tools, than I could type in my company name (XY Pizza Delivery Service).  </p>
<p>How do you deliver the result (and sentiment results), especialy in terms of positive/negative/neutral?  </p>
<p>Probably I get the name of the forums (or other source) and the number of accuarate threads with my keyword within a nice design, isn&acute;t?  </p>
<p>But how do I get the information if the thread is positive/negative or neutral. Do I get it directly, like in real time?<br />
Due to the fact that you have written that sentiment results are impossible do deliver automaticaly there has to be the described manual work. Would explain it to us,  how does that work to deliver the results in real time?  </p>
<p>Thanks for your information and thanks for the transparency of this conversation.  </p>
<p>Regards<br />
Felix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominiq</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>dominiq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Excellent article. Thanks. 
 
I&#039;d like to add a couple of things. 
 
1- Sentiment is not discrete, it&#039;s a continuum. And you&#039;ve different degree in negative sentiment. 
So your clients (and our clients) have some decision to make upfront on how they treat mildly negatives, negatives with facts, strong negative, or even legal threat. I really like your answer to Chris and the fact that you already have 5 different flavor s of rating. 
 
2- There is &quot;social&quot; in social media and when consumers say they want brands to participate, I doubt that they want their messages to be read by an algorithm. I want Amber to react or Marcel or David, not an algorithm (which by the way is wrong 30% of the time). 
 
 
Best </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article. Thanks. </p>
<p>I&#039;d like to add a couple of things. </p>
<p>1- Sentiment is not discrete, it&#039;s a continuum. And you&#039;ve different degree in negative sentiment.<br />
So your clients (and our clients) have some decision to make upfront on how they treat mildly negatives, negatives with facts, strong negative, or even legal threat. I really like your answer to Chris and the fact that you already have 5 different flavor s of rating. </p>
<p>2- There is &amp;quot;social&amp;quot; in social media and when consumers say they want brands to participate, I doubt that they want their messages to be read by an algorithm. I want Amber to react or Marcel or David, not an algorithm (which by the way is wrong 30% of the time). </p>
<p>Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber Naslund</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber Naslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-988</guid>
		<description>Chris - thanks, should clarify. &quot;I&quot; should really mean &quot;our small team&quot;. I&#039;m doing most of the sentiment tagging, but other folks on our team use the same guidelines when they&#039;re tagging stuff.

And not agreeing is perfectly okay. It&#039;s about what works for YOU. This is what works for us, for now. And if and when it doesn&#039;t, we shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; thanks, should clarify. &#8220;I&#8221; should really mean &#8220;our small team&#8221;. I&#8217;m doing most of the sentiment tagging, but other folks on our team use the same guidelines when they&#8217;re tagging stuff.</p>
<p>And not agreeing is perfectly okay. It&#8217;s about what works for YOU. This is what works for us, for now. And if and when it doesn&#8217;t, we shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber Naslund</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6181</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber Naslund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6181</guid>
		<description>Chris - thanks, should clarify. &quot;I&quot; should really mean &quot;our small team&quot;. I&#039;m doing most of the sentiment tagging, but other folks on our team use the same guidelines when they&#039;re tagging stuff.  
  
And not agreeing is perfectly okay. It&#039;s about what works for YOU. This is what works for us, for now. And if and when it doesn&#039;t, we shift. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris &#8211; thanks, should clarify. &quot;I&quot; should really mean &quot;our small team&quot;. I&#039;m doing most of the sentiment tagging, but other folks on our team use the same guidelines when they&#039;re tagging stuff.  </p>
<p>And not agreeing is perfectly okay. It&#039;s about what works for YOU. This is what works for us, for now. And if and when it doesn&#039;t, we shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.radian6.com/blog/2009/07/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6179</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radian6.com/blog/188/sentiment-tagging-some-guidelines/#comment-6179</guid>
		<description>Great post.  Have you had a chance to check out OpenAmplify yet? We do a great job of sentiment analysis using out open API.   
   
Let me know what you think.   
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.openamplify.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://community.openamplify.com&lt;/a&gt;   
   
Dave Weinberg   
Community Manager   
OpenAmplify </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  Have you had a chance to check out OpenAmplify yet? We do a great job of sentiment analysis using out open API.   </p>
<p>Let me know what you think.<br />
  <a href="http://community.openamplify.com" rel="nofollow">http://community.openamplify.com</a>   </p>
<p>Dave Weinberg<br />
Community Manager<br />
OpenAmplify</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

