< Back to Blog Home

Thumbs Up! Communicating Without Body Language


When’s the last time you gave someone an enthusiastic thumbs up? Come on, do it. Right now. Big thumbs up. It’s a happy thumb, isn’t it? That thumb is almost smiling it’s so positive and happy. But, did you know that the thumbs up gesture in some parts of the world is viewed as obscene? Like, middle finger obscene. Not so happy now, are you thumb..?

Body language and body gesturing are the most basic and fundamental forms of expression that humans use to communicate with each other. It is, rightly or wrongly, the mechanism behind our ability to make snap judgements about people. In fourth century BC Greece, you knew an upper class man from his upright, ‘firm’ stance and leisurely long strides. In Classical Rome, strict and limited gestures were viewed as indicators of an even tempered and self-controlled character – definite must haves of the day if you were a Roman aristocrat and orator.

For most of us, body language is unconscious. When you give the OK sign after falling and hurting yourself, for example, you don’t stop and think “Hmmm, should I give this OK sign with my right hand or left?” You just do it. Most of us aren’t consciously aware when we squint, or where our hands instinctively go when we are uncomfortable, but for those in certain fields – government, security, business – the science of body language is a gold mine of information.

According to ex-FBI agent and author Joe Navarro, people begin to show signs of discomfort when communicating by furrowing their forehead and crinkling their nose upwards. If someone squints, covers or rubs their eyes — that’s a sign of discomfort. If they compress or bite their lips, or touch their neck, that’s another giveaway. If you spot any of these behaviours it means there’s an issue that needs to be addressed, and you should immediately try to identify the problem.

That’s all well and good, but communicators today are facing something historically unique. The rapid advancements in mobile technology and the explosive growth of social media has changed how we communicate. According to Neilsen, one out of every two Americans will have a smartphone by December 2011, compared to just one in 10 in 2008. Today, we have ‘friends’ who we’ve never even met. So, how are we adapting to this faceless, body language free method of communicating?

Well, anyone involved in social media marketing and engagement today should find this next bit of anthropological information extremely interesting. Scientists have found that when the traditional markers of trust, such as voice intonation and body language, are hidden and only text is available, participants judge trustworthiness based on how quickly others respond.

Take for example, Southwest Airlines – vs – Kevin Smith. When the filmmaker was famously bumped from a flight because of his bulk, he immediately took to Twitter. Southwest Airlines responded to him – via Twitter – at 11:14pm on a Saturday evening. Their behavior towards Smith notwithstanding, that Saturday night response showed them to be responsive to customer complaints, and most likely earned them some Brownie points.

But we all know that responding quickly can sometimes be dangerous. You reply in the heat of the moment, or you react to something based on the mood you are currently in – and your message is misunderstood, or worse, ends up accidentally offending people.  Here are a few easy things to think about, to ensure that your message is clear and concise and free of any passive aggressive undertones.

  • Check your tone. If there’s any way that what *you* think is tonally funny could be misinterpreted, then delete and rewrite your message.
  • Think about who you are communicating with before hitting send. Your boss or another member of the CSuite might not ‘get’ your written subtleties the same way they might if you were speaking face to face. Remember that an eyebrow arch or a smile, cues that you would use in person to illustrate irony or humour, are missing in text.
  • Read your message aloud before sending. This is a really easy one, but incredibly effective. Tone tends to be evident aurally, and chances are you’ll hear harsh wording or unintended sarcasm before you will sense it by reading alone.
  • Step away from the keyboard. Especially if you are responding to a contentious issue or a difficult colleague. Urgent or not, once you’ve written your response, take an extra minute or two to clear your head prior to hitting send. Take some deep breaths. Then re-read (out loud!) and re-word if necessary.

What do you think? Have you ever been called on the carpet for an email or text that was completely misconstrued (I have!)? Or have you been the one who misinterpreted someone’s tone or intentions? What did you learn from those experiences? How do make up for the lack of visual and aural cues when communicating with people online? We would love your thoughts on this subject.

 

 



Tags: , , , , , , ,

About the author


10 Responses to “Thumbs Up! Communicating Without Body Language”

  1. Lindsay Bell says:

    Thanks for the comment Paul, and yes, I have been there and had that same experience. It's always amazing to see just how *different* two people's interpretation of the same email or text can be. It's a very personal thing too, what might read "offensive" to one person, wouldn't at all towards another. Good luck on making the adjustments, some of us work at it every day, but it's worth it if you can feel confident that your message is being received loud and clear! :)

  2. Body language, tone, and context! OH MY! <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/belllindsay&quot; rel="nofollow">@belllindsay has a few common sense tips for communicating online: http://is.gd/ABOpfT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/radian6&quot; rel="nofollow">@radian6

  3. RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/startabuzz&quot; rel="nofollow">@startabuzz: Body language, tone, and context! OH MY! <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/belllindsay&quot; rel="nofollow">@belllindsay with tips for communicating online: http://is.gd/ABOpfT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/radian6&quot; rel="nofollow">@radian6

  4. Ric Phillips says:

    We are all lucky that these days the business world has finally accepted emoticons to be used in our texts and emails. ;) Even 5 or so years ago they were mostly frowned upon in the corporate world, and viewed as 'teenager-speak'. Glad things have changed – they certainly help clarify tonality.

    Another tip we could add is to avoid CAPITALS as it looks like we are shouting. This includes the subject bar.

    Thanks for the great article!

    • Lindsay Bell says:

      Thanks Ric, and yes, you make a great point about caps. They *are* "shouting" and really, no one needs to be shouting at each other, do they? :)

  5. @inthekisser says:

    Lindsay–I love how you position tone as digital body language. This is precisely why I always recommend that companies choose community managers who first and foremost have EXCELLENT written communication skills above and beyond anything else. Might sound like a no-brainer, but so many companies choose people to be community managers just because they know how to use the tools; not because they're great communicators. A good follow up post may be tips on how to read this digital body language. Understanding (and using) the vernacular of your community is a subtle (yet very effective) way to make that bond with your network stronger.

    • Lindsay Bell says:

      I'm glad you enjoyed the post, and I agree that the need to be a good communicator – i.e. using the written word – is half the battle and a rapidly dying art. Words are powerful. And they convey so much emotion, even when they aren't 'meant' to. I love your idea for a followup post – stay tuned, because I have something in the works already on that exact subject! Enjoy your day, LB

  6. @Tim_Weaver says:

    I've read Navarro's book "What Every Body Is Saying", which was targeted toward people who need to read body language for a living…interviewers and interrogators. In that context, his book is awesome, but if taken as a definitive work by the "lay person", there is definitely a chance for it to be misinterpreted. However, if taken for what it is…a general guide as to what non-verbal communication can indicate…it is definitely useful outside of military and law enforcement circles, too.

    The challenge of the Internet is the same inherent in all written communications…people are either good at it, or they're not (they lack the skill or motivation to be good written communicators). I have read more than my fair share of text-based emails and reports that failed to convey the real message the writer was trying to get across. I have also authored more than a few of the same.

    The suggestions above should certainly help, but I think part of the challenge is conveying just how important writing is within the context of "communities". So many folks have grown up in the era of 140-character limited SMS and Twitter messages that the ability to accurately translate what they're trying to say into longer prose becomes almost as difficult as going the other way.

    Words have meaning, irrespective of original intent. Use the wrong one, with the wrong meaning/in the wrong context, at the wrong time and you'll pay for it (see Entemann's recent Twitter fiasco).

    Someone can know a lot about "community", but unless they can accurately convey all the subtleties they're really trying to convey…and none of the ones they are not…then how valuable are they, really, to a company's overall efforts?

  7. Lindsay Bell says:

    Hi TIm, Jim Navarro actually speaks at length about how effective being skilled in body language reading can be for businesses as well – salesmen of all stripes have been using psychology and body language decoding for years to increase sales and leads. To @inthekisser's point, hiring someone who can't communicate effectively and then expecting them to lead or participate in a team of communicators (i.e. community managers) does everyone a disservice. Thanks for commenting, LB

    • @Tim_Weaver says:

      Yes, he does address that and, in retrospect, the book probably is geared toward a wider audience than I initially said, however my exposure to it is within the context I described. Sometimes, I think a little too narrowly. :)

Leave a Reply

Facebook Twitter YouTube Google+ Slideshare
Radian6 Subscribe

Radian6

radian6's Channel

Tell us a bit about yourself to begin your download

* Denotes a Mandatory Field

Radian6 Now Offers You More


Radian6 Mobile Has Been Improved

Radian6 Mobile Has Been Updated

Improvements in Version 1.0.5 include:

  • Twitter mentions & hashtags are tappable from the workflow page
  • Keywords in the stack and workflow pages are highlighted
  • Tap a profile pic to see the social profile of the post author

Learn more

Get the most from your results with Radian6 Insights

Understand Social Like Never Before

Combine the coverage and depth of Radian6 with 3rd-party content for:

  • Demographics like age, gender, and location
  • Influence scores and topics
  • One-click lists of the most talked about people, places and things
  • And much more…

Learn more

Introducing the Salesforce Social Hub

Introducing the Salesforce Social Hub

Automate & Scale Social Media using the Salesforce Social Hub™ for:

  • Customer Service
  • Data Analysis
  • Community Management
  • Marketing & Product Development

 Learn more